After the debate the Frank Luntz Focus Group indicated that before the debate that only one supported Cain afterward nearly all supported Cain. I admit Cain had a good night with a lot of good answers, but for me there seemed to be something missing, oh say like a Constitutional Principle to back up some of his logic or his non specifics when it came to certain issues like foreign policy. Then conveniently Hannity spent the majority of the time talking to Pawlenty and Santorum the two Neo-Con establishment candidates thus creating a feeling of favoritism for the status quo and the TEA Party left out in the cold.
Herman Cain a TEA Party Ruse?
Herman Cain a TEA Party Ruse?
Herman Cain a TEA Party Ruse?
After the debate the Frank Luntz Focus Group indicated that before the debate that only one supported Cain afterward nearly all supported Cain. I admit Cain had a good night with a lot of good answers, but for me there seemed to be something missing, oh say like a Constitutional Principle to back up some of his logic or his non specifics when it came to certain issues like foreign policy. Then conveniently Hannity spent the majority of the time talking to Pawlenty and Santorum the two Neo-Con establishment candidates thus creating a feeling of favoritism for the status quo and the TEA Party left out in the cold.